Impact of Charter Schools on Revere

June 10, 2016
By

By Dianne Kelley, Carol Tye and Paul Dakin

As the statewide debate over the expansion of charter schools continues and November’s ballot question to lift the existing cap on charter schools looms, it’s important to consider the impact of charter schools on Revere.

This year alone, charter schools will siphon off $1,787,210 in funds that would otherwise stay in the Revere Public Schools, and be used to improve learning for all students. For students, this funding loss means larger class sizes, fewer interventions for students who have learning gaps, and cut backs in support staffing for technology and other special areas.  With the additional cuts to our budget caused by the change in definition of poverty, we are at a financial breaking point.

None of us should be surprised that after years of shrinking budgets, our local schools are failing to meet the needs of many of our students. A recent report by a school budget review commission found that Massachusetts is underfunding public education by at least $1 billion a year. The ability of our schools to provide students with more opportunities for science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education, and enrichment programs such as music, art, and athletics, is already threatened. And now, charter schools are taking more than $400 million in funds each year from our local school districts.

Numerous studies have shown that early education is the most effective way to ensure a child’s success later in life, but only 41% of 3- and 4-year-old children in Revere are enrolled in an early education program. Statewide, Massachusetts has over 16,000 children on waiting lists for pre-school programs. At the very least, we should provide access to pre-school and early learning programs for every child instead of giving money to more unaccountable charter schools.

Part of the problem is that the state approves charter schools even when the communities where they will be located are opposed to them. This has happened in Brockton, Gloucester, and many other communities. Charter schools are not accountable to the local taxpayers who have to pay for them or the communities they serve. That’s wrong. Parents and taxpayers in Revere should have the final say on what kind of schools we want.

A report from the Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, released last month, found that 60 percent of charter schools in Massachusetts don’t have a single parent on their boards of trustees.

Clearly, some of our vschools are struggling, particularly in our urban areas. We should be committed to fixing them – not keep taking money away and giving it to charters which accept fewer English-language learners and kids with significant special needs. Expanding a two-track system of separate and unequal schools, where students with the most challenges remain in local district schools with fewer and fewer resources, is not consistent with our Massachusetts values.

The ballot question will allow charters to expand into areas where they don’t exist right now — anywhere in the state — taking millions away from successful neighborhood public schools and causing the elimination of programs, increases in class sizes, and other damaging cuts in the schools that most families choose. In Revere, allowing charter schools to take more money away from our public school system will only hurt the majority of students. We need to fully fund our public school system before we consider spending more money on charter schools.

Dianne Kelly,  is the current Superintendentof School for Revere.  Paul Dakin and Carol Tye are Superintendent Emeritus of the Revere Public Schools.

Search the Journal


Full Print Edition

Get Adobe Flash player