Quack,Quack: Duck Hunters and Some Residents Having Harder Time Sharing Space

Duck hunters from Adam Smith’s Perfect Limit company are shown hunting sea ducks off of Revere Beach last Friday. Using a motor boat, barges and duck decoys, hunters from all over the world travel to Revere to claim one of the area’s unique duck species. Nevertheless, not all residents
are as excited as the hunters about the sport.

Living on Revere Beach or near the Rumney Marsh, there are a lot of unexpected surprises that emerge from nature and such things that go along with a serene landscape.

For example, there are coyotes on the Marsh.

People on the Beach occasionally see Bald Eagles.

But one might not expect quiet winter mornings on the Beach being punctuated by the occasional shotgun blast. That, however, is precisely what many residents on the Beach and those who abut the Marshes hear during duck season – which stretches from October through January and brings scores of hunters to the area for a prized Common Eider, Atlantic Brant or Scoter.

Since Colonial times, duck hunters have flocked to the shores of Revere Beach and into the marshes. Today’s hunters are still protected by laws drafted during that same Colonial period ensuring access to hunting and fishing grounds in tidal areas. Nevertheless, as hunting has waned locally in popularity and Revere has become less country and more urban, hunters and residents of the city’s coastline have had a much more difficult time sharing space.

“I am never looking to hurt the people who like to do this as a sport, but there is a difference between urban and rural areas,” said State Rep. Kathi-Anne Reinstein, who annually files a bill to try to ban the hunters from Revere, though it has never gone anywhere. “We’re very urban here now and have been built up with a lot of homes near the hunting areas. It’s not the old Rumney Marsh now. I respect the old laws put in place, but we have to move with the times. Revere hasn’t been that place for a long time.”

Adam Smith, on the contrary, has run a hunting guide service – called Perfect Limit – off of Revere for more than 20 years and knows the duck hunting areas here better than anyone in the Commonwealth.

He told the Journal that his clients come from as far away as South Africa to hunt ducks in Revere waters. Apparently, while the local sea ducks seem commonplace to those who have lived her for a lifetime, they are quite rare and prized to duck hunters from other ends of the Earth.

“There are people who come from all over the world to shoot these particular ducks,” he said in an interview on Monday. “I have had people from South Africa. I had a group this fall from the Island of Malta, two groups from France and one group from England. They come from everywhere…These are collectors that want to have the perfect collection of all North American waterfowl. To get the perfect collection, you have to come here because these ducks are not everywhere. They want to shoot the ducks, take them to a taxidermist, have them stuffed and then put them on their walls.”

Add that to the fact that ducks are a challenging bird to hunt, and you get a sport that draws great interest.

“Ducks have always been a very huntable bird because of the challenge,” he said. “They’re not the easiest things in the world to hit.”

The particular ducks that are so prized are the Eider, the Scoter and the Atlantic Brant. All are migratory ducks that come from Quebec and Nova Scotia and have learned over the centuries that Revere is a great place for a guaranteed meal and a few months of respite.

“The reason for all the ducks on Revere Beach is they’re finding something to eat there and they remember that and come back year after year,” he said. “What they’re finding is the immature sea clams and there are a lot of those around here.”

The laws allowing hunting in this area have, in fact, survived from the Colonial era and were put in place to ensure that the general public could not be excluded from having access to the ocean and, consequently, could not be excluded from taking food from those same waters. Basically, the old law says that any area where tides come in or out is protected for the public for the purposes of fishing, general access and fowling.

This has been a matter of fact that some Revere residents – particularly those in the Riverside and Point of Pines areas – have begrudgingly accepted as the laws have been tested and retested for years without any changes.

“The Colonial Ordinance is something that has been looked at by the courts no fewer than 20 times and each time it has been decided in favor of the hunters,” said Smith. “The judges will not even look at it anymore.”

Another law, though, which has not been tested is the Hunter Harassment Law. That law, Smith said, is about to be tested and involves a battle between the duck hunters and condo residents on Revere Beach, who in larger numbers are growing to dislike the barges and boats hunting within eyesight and earshot.

The Harassment Law sprung from a situation where deer hunters were getting their vehicles vandalized while on a special deer hunt sponsored by the state in the Quabbin Reservoir – a hunt that was to eliminate the burgeoning deer populations that were beginning to threaten the area’s largest water supply. Nevertheless, many were offended and attacked the property of the hunters.

That ignited an effort – ironically led by two prominent hunting clubs based in Revere – to pass the Law. It states that a person can complain once to the authorities, and if the source of their complaint is a legal hunting activity, then they cannot complain again or they risk being arrested for harassment.

Smith’s recent troubles started on Jan. 12th when – in an unprecedented move – the State Environmental Police wrote him a ticket for shooting live birds from a moving vehicle. State law prevents the hunters from shooting while the boats and barges are moving. They can only retrieve the ducks using engine power once they are shot. Smith said he always follows that rule.

“That law has never been tested, but it’s about to be,” he said. “The people in the condos on Revere Beach are complaining to the Environmental Police officer and driving him crazy. He actually wrote me a ticket that should have never been written. He wrote that ticket to get them off his back. I believe it will be thrown out immediately, no argument.”

Reinstein said she doesn’t want to make hunters upset, but she sympathizes with the residents – noting that she has received tons of video from Beach residents of the hunters’ near-daily excursions.

“Where people are hearing these gunshots near their homes, they are concerned about their safety and that of their children and pets,” said Reinstein. “I have to be responsive to my constituents and this is an issue for them. Each year I get a call asking me to look into this and to file the bill again.”

Smith said he understands that the shooting can put nearby residents on the alert, but he assures everyone that there is zero chance of anyone being hit.

Certainly, about 10 years ago and many years prior, there were verified stories and police reports of residents abutting the marsh having their house siding pelted with lead shotgun pellets. There have been other stories as well about stray blasts infringing on those walking the Beach. That, Smith said, is a thing of the past due to the fact that technology has changed the shotgun ammunition.

“The type of ammunition that is used now for hunting these ducks has half the velocity of the old lead shot,” he said. “On occasion, when someone has come up from nearby and complained to me, I just give them my gun and tell them that I’m going to walk 100 yards away from them and let them shoot right at me. Nothing will happen to me because it will not travel that far. We have laws saying you cannot discharge a firearm within 500 feet of a dwelling and we don’t do that. People who see us out there have zero chance of getting hit.”

Tom O’Shea, assistant director of wildlife in the state’s Division of Fish and Wildlife, said Smith and other duck hunters are heavily regulated and performing a legitimate activity on the state’s waterways.

He said that the duck season here stretches from October to Jan. 31st – just now concluding. Another Canadian Goose season continues until Feb. 15th. He said state and federal laws cover duck hunting regulations. Hunters have to be licensed by the state and have to get a ‘duck stamp’ from his division and the feds. Additionally, they have to have permits to carry a firearm and have to abide by all of the requirements related to discharging a firearm more than 500 feet from a dwelling. They also may not go past the high tide mark on the shore to conduct the hunting.

He added that the newer ammunition also adds additional safety for the environment and for those nearby the hunters – even though residents might still be able to hear the guns firing.

All in all, O’Shea said balancing the rights of the hunters and the rights of residents is about respecting one another.

“I think as long as people understand that hunting is a legitimate activity where people are licensed and have permission to be on the property they’re on and are following state statutes, the rest is having respect for each other,” he said. “It’s about the hunters being respectful of the property owners, the residents and minimizing impacts to property. It’s also about the property owners [and residents] respecting that the hunters have a right – as long as they are licensed – to perform this legitimate activity.

“We have close to 65,000 hunters in the state and the vast majority hunt without incident,” he continued. “I don’t see a conflict. I think it’s a legitimate activity. We have setbacks for a reason and that buffer is for the general public.”

Concluded Smith, “We follow the ducks. They will be here next year. These ducks are no going to forget there’s something to eat on Revere Beach.”

Seth Daniel:

View Comments

  • I don't really care that much if if people hunt ducks during the winter months, but I would like to see someone force them to stop discharging their shells directly into the water. If you walk along the beach during the winter, you'll see hundreds of these washed up on the shore. I suspect isn't legal, but even if it is, "O’Shea said balancing the rights of the hunters and the rights of residents is about respecting one another". Polluting the beach doesn't seem very respectful to me.

  • People have been hunting there since the 1600s with guns. You moved in yesterday. Guess who's in the right? You can't move into East Boston and tell the airport to shut down. You want noise? I live a few house lots away from the Amtrak line, and the trains shake my foundation. I don't complain to the railroad, I deal with it. At 500 yards you barely hear a pop. Get a life, yuppies.

  • Are these species threatened because of over hunting or for other reasons? Is there a concern the there is overkill specifically in the Rumney Marsh area? I wish the article had broached these subjects in order to give the reader a broader picture of the issues (or non-issues) Otherwise, good article!

    • If it was an issue, it would have been included. It's not an issue. If you want those facts, you can easily find them yourself. Sorry the author didn't spoonfeed you.

  • @2big2fail593:disqus The duck stamps that are mentioned in the article are what fund the census of these animals which in turn determines how many stamps will be issued the following year and what the bag limits will be. The system actually works pretty well in terms of the hunters funding the conservation efforts of the species their sport goes after. So it is not really something that would come up in the article because if they were a threatened species there would, by default, be no permits or stamps being issued. Oftentimes there is more likely to be an issue of overpopulation by an animal species in areas where hunting is not allowed (e.g. too densely populated with housing, local bans or in conservation areas like around the Quabbin, etc.).

    • The locals don't realize that if the ducks weren't hunted, they'd be crapping all over the locals' houses and yards and the locals would get p.o.'d about that.... they just want to complain about something.

  • People! Did you even read or think about this? The issue at hand isn't whether it's wrong to kill the ducks or whether they're endangered or anything like that, it's whether people should be allowed to hunt them near a heavily populated area. People aren't generally allowed to hunt land animals in city parks, so it's not unreasonable to question whether they should be allowed to hunt in water that's near a heavily populated urban area. I personally don't have that much problem with it (except for the littering of the beach with spent shells), but I think it warrants discussion. P.S. JonFrum: If you hadn't noticed, there aren't really any yuppies in Revere or East Boston.

    • First of all, Frum's comment was suggesting that the complaining is something yuppies would do whether or not yuppies were actually doing it. Whoever is complaining is acting like a yuppie. As stated, there's ZERO chance of any of the local residents being injured. Maybe you didn't read the article closely enough. Also, comparing duck hunting in the sea or marshes to hunting in city parks is to create a flawed analogy purposely to make your point seem reasonable. Hunting in city parks isn't allowed because there's usually not enough distance and cover. However, in many areas with plenty of hiking and biking activity, hunting most assuredly is allowed... hunters are hidden, usually far off the trail, usually in a stand aiming down and with a lot of green to stop ricochets, etc. Anyways, the laws exist as they do so that hunters don't have to defend their safety record every single time someone ignorant like yourself comes along and makes the same ignorant claims and complaints as the last ignorant person. Get educated.

  • as a point of pines resident I am strongly opposed to being woken up in the early morning hours by gunshot sounds that reverberate over the water not to mention they don't even honor the restricted hours they start earlier than allowed I would thing the noise ordinance would protect us due to the fact that it definetely affects our quality of life.

This website uses cookies.