Stumbling Blocks: Just Another Bright Idea

November 3, 2011
By

I’ve always been a zealot for lighting.

The lighting of a room has always been a priority for me. My wife thinks I’m crazy. Before her, my mother thought the same. I guess it goes back to my life-long interest in photography, but who really knows.

That said, a couple months ago I was given a few of the new energy efficient “green” light bulbs to put into my lamps and light fixtures.

You know the ones, the little squiggly bulbs that are supposed to save us tremendous amounts of money.

I put one in my favorite lamp and tuned it on.

It was horrid.

It was like being in a tanning bed. The light was almost blue or purple in color; very cold looking. It took forever to get bright, and it made me want to vomit when I tried to read under it.

I took out another “green” light bulb that looked more like a traditional bulb.

Maybe it was better because it was shaped like a bulb, I thought.

No luck there. It was worse, and I can hardly believe this is what’s being called progress.

Within minutes, I had restored all of my old incandescent bulbs to their familiar homes.

It was like a cold drink on a hot day.

• • • •

I’ve been dreading the elimination of the old light bulb for some time.

It’s been on the horizon for the past several years, every since Congress deemed that they had to take it away from us because we weren’t smart enough to make our own decisions.

For those who aren’t aware, beginning this January, the United States government will begin phasing out the old incandescent light bulb. It will be a two-year process until, in 2014, they are pretty much all gone.

Already, Europe has gone down this road, and much to the disappointment of the general public there. Incandescent light bulb sales spiked for the year prior to their legislative elimination. Funny enough, one of the major stockpilers was the esteemed museums throughout Europe. Like myself, they realized these new energy efficient bulbs made everything look like a pile of manure – especially their treasured paintings.

The idea behind the new bulbs is that they will save us a tremendous amount of money on energy costs, as they do use far less energy.

Such decisions by the government seem to be more common.

They always seem to be telling us what’s best for us, rather than letting the markets and us – the consumers – decide what is the best product. If these new light bulbs were a better product, people would be buying them in droves in order to save money on a similar quality product.

Because these bulbs stink and everyone knows it, the government has to outlaw the older, better bulbs.

• • • •

I knew that there were going to have to be some changes when my little daughter first got her hands on the buttons of my stereo system.

Those changes were forced into action when she opened up the DVD player, stuffed it full of macaroni and cheese, and then closed it again.

We had two choices.

We could totally re-arrange our house by putting almost everything out of her reach, some five feet off of the floor, or just endure the process of teaching her that some things in the house are off limits.

The choice is to harshly restrict her world by eliminating things we don’t want her to mess with, or to leave those things where they are and teach her to leave them alone over time.

Not long after becoming a father did I realize that the best way is to teach kids boundaries within their environment, rather than taking everything away. Changing up the environment every few months as they grow – putting things behind locked doors, building new shelves up high, and restricting access to most things – only makes a kid angry. It also makes them want to mess with that forbidden object even more.

• • • •

I find that at every turn, with every passing year, there are more and more things that the government doesn’t want me to do – more and more DVD players that I can’t stuff with macaroni and cheese, if you will.

In California, you can’t use a gas lawnmower, nor can you fire up a charcoal BBQ grill. I think it would be safe to say what happens in California will soon happen in Massachusetts, and probably nationwide at some point – if the government gets its way.

We’re told that it’s wrong to drive trucks, vans or big vehicles.

They would appreciate it if we would jam ourselves and our families into those little tiny boxes on wheels – such as you see so often in places like Newton or Brookline; the vehicles that are taller than they are long.

What I don’t get is why I can’t choose where I want to spend my money and where I want to save it.

I know all about saving money. I have to. I pinch pennies in every direction that I can out of necessity – as so many of us do and have done for years.

But why can’t I spend money on my favorite light bulb if that’s what is important to me? Maybe I will save money and help the environment in some other way, such as walking more often and driving less often – as I also have already been doing for years.

Yet I hold out no hope.

That’s because it’s not about saving the environment as much as it is about forcing us to do something that is important to someone else.

So for now, like the Louvre Museum and other sensible Europeans, I’m going out to Wal-Mart to buy as many old light bulbs as I can fit into my vehicle – my big, gas-guzzling, soon-to-be-outlawed vehicle.

  • http://profiles.google.com/lostangeles09 frank dillon

    I grew up in Revere but live in Los Angeles.  You can use a charcoal grill in LA county, you can use a gas powered lawnmower.  There is legislation that will not let home owners use their fireplaces that will begin to be enforeced on 01-01-2012.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, this is Massachusetts where we are not allowed to enjoy our lives, and the government has the right to impose its rules and decisions on every facet of our personal existence.  The year 1650, anyone?!

  • RevereReporter

    Dillon is right in one respect. I should have said SOME models of lawn misers and grills are not permitted. There are models we can buy here that aren’t for sale there. Good point. Fireplace restriction is interesting. Bet the rich coastal dwellers will really adhere to that one….

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/P7S27UVVZ467GZNV6ZSQACRFXA Dave

    Another piece of biased, uninformed, and downright embarrassing commentary from the Revere Journal (a.k.a. “the 5th grade class project that made it small-town-big” ).

    The writer fails to mention the most important fact in this whole discussion, which is that compact florescent lighting produces the same amount of light with about 25% the electricity of an conventional incandescent bulb (for those of you who slept through remedial math at RHS, that means that they’re fully 4 times more efficient… that is tremendous, if you ask me).
     
    The photography example is fairly bunk too.  He has obviously never compared a photograph taken under a modern CF bulb and compared it to one taken under an incandescent and noticed that the CF results in a white balance that is much closer to natural sunlight than the conventional bulb.

    What will we see in next week’s edition?  An editorial espousing that we have a constitutional “right” to cruise up and down Revere Beach Blvd in a Hummer with firearms mounted in the dash?

  • RevereReporter

    Once again, here goes Dave…This is an opinion piece, a new column taken on by this writer. This is one man’s opinion, and I can pretty safely say I’m not the only one who thinks this way. The bulbs stink. In terms of warmth of light, ie the color temperature (photo reference), they are sickening. You are not like me. You don’t mind this and enjoy the efficiency. You make your choice, but I am prevented by an Act of Congress from making my choice, a choice that I and others consider to be a quality of life decision. That is offensive to me and not to you. Great.
    I think a lot of your criticism is based on a misunderstanding of where these stories are placed in the print edition.
    For someone as opinionated as you are, it’s odd that you can’t tolerate another man having an opinion.
    Newspapers have had news and commentary for 100s of years.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/P7S27UVVZ467GZNV6ZSQACRFXA Dave

    The online edition definitely doesn’t inspire me to spend any money on the print edition.   I can tolerate another opinion, I just feel compelled to point out the problems with opinions that have unfortunate consequences for everyone else.  Yes, you’re not the only one with this opinion… There are lots of ignorant selfish Americans who believe that we have the “right” to continue to consume 5 or 6 times the energy that the rest of the world does on a per capita basis.  Is it just a coincidence that most of them come from places like Texas, Mississippi, and Revere where education levels lag the rest of the country?   

Search the Journal


Recent Activity

Full Print Edition

Get Adobe Flash player