Let’s make a Deal – The Speaker and the Governor Appear to be Sitting at the Same Table

March 30, 2011
By

Speaker Robert DeLeo appears to be coming closer to reaching an agreement with Governor Deval Patrick about what exact shape and form an expanded gambling bill will take.

All signals are pointing to a dramatic increase in interaction between the governor and the speaker – and in fact, a meeting apparently held by the two took place Tuesday afternoon in the governor’s office where they discussed the particulars.

The speaker seems to be getting much more motivated these days about a new expanded gambling bill.

In a way, he is coming home on the issue more so than ever before.

The speaker represents Revere. He represents Winthrop.

These two communities are at the vortex of his political life.

Both communities will benefit mightily if a casino comes to Suffolk Downs.

Both communities – and East Boston – would undergo an economic resurgence with the creation of hundreds of jobs, the investment of more than $100 million in capital, and which would be capped off with a new and powerful stream of tax revenue.

New businesses would be born and in the short term, a casino at Suffolk Downs would be a significant boost to the economy.

The long-term outlook is the same.

Casinos in New England have not failed.

Massachusetts will be the benefactor of thousands upon thousands of people who will forego their trips to Foxwoods and to Mohegan Sun because Suffolk Downs is closer.

There is no further need for study and debate at this point is as worthless as Suffolk Downs going out of business and the land empty.

The speaker is apparently of the mind that the House needs to get moving on a new bill.

However, the governor has repeatedly said that this time around it is either going to be his way or no way.

The speaker isn’t going capitulate to the governor.

Yet the speaker must give the governor what he wants or come very close or the governor will not bite on an expanded gambling bill.

The possibility of selling three casino licenses in Massachusetts is the possibility of raising $300 – $500 million in licensing fees just like that, with the snap of a finger.

Over at Suffolk Downs, Mr. Fields, the owner, is ready to go. He’d hire 1,000 men and women, trades people, vendors, et cetera overnight with a license in his hand and what’s better, he’d do the right thing at the track property.

For our area, for these struggling working class neighborhoods, a casino is not panacea. Gambling is not panacea.

However, an expanded gambling bill agreed upon by the governor and the speaker would be reason for celebration because it would inevitably mean new jobs and lots of money being invested and a future that will be far more promising than it will be without it.

Boston is a world-class city. A casino is just one more reason for the tens of millions of tourists coming here to enjoy themselves if they so desire.

Revere, Winthrop and East Boston residents are crying for jobs.

This will help, and the speaker knows that.

Good luck Mr. Speaker.

  • Anonymous

    I hope the speaker realizes that he can eventually get to slots at the two tracks in SEMass by first getting an agreement with the governor for three destination resort casinos. Everyone is aware that Bay Staters spend about $700M each year at the CT casinos and about $250M each year at the RI racinos. Once we have three casinos, we’ll be able to gauge if we’re still losing $ to the RI racinos. If we are, then perhaps the governor, speaker and senate president can strike an agreement to allow each of the two SEMass tracks to bid against each other for the right for one racino slot license?

    We have to stop this ridiculous export of MA tax revenues, spending and jobs to the CT casinos and RI racinos. Settling for 75% is a good deal for Massachusetts to start. In a few years, maybe we can have agreement on slots at the two SEMass tracks and recoup the other 25%.

    Compromise between the governor, speaker and senate president is essential. After all, our late Senator Kennedy proved that compromising was essential to getting results.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Suffolk-Downs-Neighbor/100001205656374 Suffolk Downs Neighbor

    Every community that has hosted a casino or slot parlor has seen an increase in crime and a negative impact on small businesses. The former mayor of Ledyard, CT, the home of Foxwoods, is now an outspoken casino opponent. Their community is overburdened while the rest of the state reaps all of the benefits. Haven’t we had enough of that around here already?
    Are you sure Revere is going to get its fair share? What is a fair share? Our legislators don’t know. Call them and ask: 617-722-2000. Here’s what they’ll tell you: “The benefits will far outweigh the costs, don’t worry about it.” Ask them to list the costs, seriously, how can they make any claims about benefits if they don’t know the costs?
    The connected will get the good jobs and the rest will get part-time jobs as dealers and house-keepers (dealers make 15k a year – check out the bureau of labor and statistics). Our neighborhoods will be trampled and restaurants and small businesses will close.
    Make a quick phone call to protect your neighborhood. Ask your Representative and Senator to support an Independent Analysis of the impact a casino will have on your neighborhood before they plug in one slot machine at Suffolk Downs. They won’t do it because they don’t answer to you. They answer to the casino industry.

  • smudge

    I hope you are not serious about the crime going up in Revere.  East Boston, Revere, Chelsea, Winthrop are the drug capitals of the state already.  It can only help to have more police and security in the area.  Clean up these slums and get the low lifes out or learn to work

Search the Journal

Recent Activity

Full Print Edition

Get Adobe Flash player